Method and apparatus for self servowriting of tracks of a disk drive using an observer based on an equivalent one-dimensional state model

ABSTRACT

A method is disclosed for writing servo patterns for tracks on a rotating magnetic disk medium of a magnetic disk drive. In the method, track following is performed along a reference track, defined by previously written servo burst patterns, using a servo loop having a closed-loop response. A position error signal is generated for the reference track based on the track following. A correction signal is generated based on the track following using an observer of a one-dimensional state model that is equivalent to the two-dimensional state model of the servo loop. Servo patterns are written at a target radial location on the magnetic disk medium during track following of the reference track. The position error signal of the servo loop is adjusted based on the correction signal to reduce radial error propagation from the reference track to the servo burst patterns at the target radial location.

This application is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 10/232,640, filed Aug. 30, 2002, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,924,961, incorporated herein by reference.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention

The present invention relates to magnetic disk drives, and more particularly, to self servowriting of tracks on a rotating magnetic disk medium.

2. Description of the Prior Art and Related Information

The writing of servotrack information on a magnet disk medium is a critical process in the manufacture of a disk drive. Conventionally, servotrack information is written with a specialized servowriting instrument mounted on a large granite block to minimize external vibration effects. Increasing track densities and decreasing disk-drive size has led to the investigation of self servowriting techniques. One issue confronting the use of self servowriting is track-to-track or radial error propagation and amplification of written-in errors and imperfections with respect to a perfectly circular track.

U.S. Pat. No. 5,907,447 to Yarmchuk et al. describes reduction of radial error propagation by generating a correction signal using a filter applied to a position error signal (PES) to reduce a closed-loop response of a track-following servo loop to less than unity at frequencies equal to integer multiples of the disk rotation frequency. While permitting implementation of self servowriting with reduced radial error propagation, the PES filtering technique of the Yarmchuk patent fails to readily support increasingly aggressive track densities.

Accordingly, there exists a need for technique for aggressively reducing written-in error propagation during self servowriting. The present invention satisfies these needs.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention may be embodied in a method, implemented in a magnetic disk drive, for writing servo patterns for tracks on a rotating magnetic disk medium. In the method, track following is performed along a reference track, defined by previously written servo burst patterns, using a servo loop having a closed-loop response. A position error signal is generated for the reference track based on the track following. A correction signal is generated based on the track following using an observer of a one-dimensional state model that is equivalent to the two-dimensional state model of the servo loop. Servo patterns are written at a target radial location on the magnetic disk medium during track following of the reference track. The position error signal of the servo loop is adjusted based on the correction signal to reduce radial error propagation from the reference track to the servo burst patterns at the target radial location.

Alternatively, the present invention may be embodied in a method, and related apparatus, for creating servo patterns on the disk medium. Track following is performed on a reference track, defined by previously placed servo burst patterns, using a servo loop having a closed-loop response. A position error signal is generated for the reference track based on the track following. A correction signal is generated based on the track following using an observer of a one-dimensional state model that is equivalent to a two-dimensional state model of the servo loop. Servo patterns are formed defining a target track during track following of the reference track. The position error signal of the servo loop is adjusted based on the correction signal to reduce radial error propagation from the reference track to the target track.

In more a detailed feature of the inventions, the dimensions of the two-dimensional state model may be circumferential position and radial position.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The accompanying drawings illustrate embodiments of the present invention and, together with the description, serve to explain the principles of the invention.

FIG. 1 is a flow chart illustrating a first embodiment of a method for writing servo patterns for tracks on a rotating magnetic disk medium of a disk drive, according to the present invention.

FIG. 2 is a block diagram of a disk drive coupled to a host for implementing the method of FIG. 1.

FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram illustrating a transducer head, having non-overlapping read and write elements offset by at least two servo tracks, for self-servo writing servo bursts for defining servo tracks, according to the first embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 4 is a block diagram of the track-following servo loop.

FIG. 5 is a block diagram of an equivalent track-following servo loop having one dimension, according to the present invention.

FIG. 6A is a schematic diagram illustrating ideal servo sector tracks on a disk of a disk drive.

FIG. 6B is a schematic diagram illustrating written servo sector tracks exhibiting imperfections.

FIG. 7 is a flow chart illustrating a second embodiment of a method for creating servo patterns for tracks on a rotating magnetic disk medium of a disk drive, according to the present invention.

FIG. 8 is a schematic diagram illustrating a transducer head, having non-overlapping read and write elements offset by at least two servo tracks, for self-servo writing servo bursts for defining servo tracks, according to the second embodiment of the present invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

With reference to FIGS. 1 through 5, the present invention may be embodied in a method 10 (FIG. 1), implemented in the disk drive 30 (FIG. 2), for writing servo patterns A–D (FIG. 3) for tracks 12 on a rotating magnetic disk medium. In the method, track following is performed along a reference track N, defined by previously written servo burst patterns, A and B, using a servo loop 22 (FIG. 4) having a closed-loop response (step 14). A position error signal PES is generated for the reference track based on the track following (step 16). A correction signal η_(k)(t) is generated based on the track following using an observer 28 (FIG. 5) of a one-dimensional state model 26 that is equivalent to the two-dimensional state model of the servo loop (step 18). Servo patterns D are written at a target radial location on the magnetic disk medium during track following of the reference track (step 19). The position error signal of the servo loop is adjusted based on the correction signal to reduce radial error propagation from the reference track to the servo burst patterns at the target radial location.

The dimensions of the two-dimensional state model may be circumferential position and radial position. The servo patterns A–D for the tracks 12 may be sequentially written across the entire disk surface by repetition of the self servowriting technique.

Advantageously, seed servo burst patterns, A and B, for initially defining servo track N, are written using a technique for forming as near perfect circular track path as practical. Also, interleaved permanent and temporary servo burst patterns may be used to address timing and sensor element cross-talk issues. Accordingly, the permanent servo burst patterns may be used for track following while the temporary servo burst patterns are written, and the temporary servo burst patterns may be used for track following while the permanent servo burst patterns are written. After servo tracks are written across the entire disk surface, the temporary servo burst patterns would then revert to data sectors of the corresponding data tracks and eventually would be overwritten by user data. Also, while not explicitly described above, the servo burst patterns C centered on servo track N may be written as a seed track for defining, in conjunction with later written servo burst patterns D, servo track N+1.

The disk drive 30 (FIG. 2) has a head disk assembly (HDA) 32 and a sampled servo controller 34. The HDA includes a rotating magnetic disk 36 having distributed position information in a plurality of uniformly spaced-apart servo wedges 38, a rotary actuator 40 that pivots relative to a base and that carries a transducer head 42 that periodically reads the position information from the servo wedges, and a voice coil motor (VCM) circuit 44 that includes a voice coil motor coupled to the rotary actuator and that responds to a control effort signal 46. The sampled servo controller periodically adjusts the control effort signal during a track-following operation based on the position information. Advantageously, the transducer head has a read element 48 and an offset write element 50 (FIG. 3). Generally, the write element is wider than the read element. The center of the read element may be spaced from a nearest edge of the write element by at least one servo track such that the elements do not overlap. If the read element and the write element are aligned, then seed tracks may be written at or near a zero skew area, and the self servowritten tracks propagated away from the zero skew area.

An ideal data track 52 is one that forms a perfect circle on the disk 36, as shown in FIG. 6A. During manufacture, servo information for the embedded servo sectors 38 is placed on the disk as a result of the self servowriting operation. The servo information includes servo bursts that are placed at locations that deviate outwardly or inwardly from the ideal “center line” of the data track circle as shown in FIG. 6B. These apparent deviations from the ideal data track center line can occur due to spindle runout, vibrations or movements during servo writing operation, and media defects or noise in the region of the servo bursts.

The disk drive 30 further includes a control system 54, and the HDA 32 further includes a spindle motor 60 and a preamplifier 66. The control system includes the sampled servo controller 34, and circuitry and processors that control the HDA and that provide an intelligent interface between a host 58 and the HDA for execution of read and write commands. The control system may have an internal microprocessor and nonvolatile memory for implementing the techniques of the invention. Program code for implementing the techniques of the invention may be stored in the nonvolatile memory and transferred to volatile random access memory (RAM) for execution by the microprocessor.

The user data tracks 52 on the media surface may be divided into the storage segments. Each storage segment may begin with the servo sector 38 which is followed by data sectors. The data sectors may include data blocks, each generally storing 512 data bytes. Each data block may be addressed using a logical block address (LBA).

The servo control loop 22 (FIG. 2) includes the HDA 32 after the track-following compensator 20. Disturbances ζ_(k) to the HDA alter the resulting head position y_(k+1). A track selection signal y_(k) is compared to the head position y_(k+1) to generate the PES.

With reference again to FIGS. 4 and 5, the two-dimensional state model for the servo loop 22 is described and the equivalent one-dimensional state model 26 is derived.

A state-space model for the HDA 32 is given by x _(k) ^(G)(t+1)=A _(g) x _(k) ^(G)(t)+B _(g) u _(k)(t) y _(k+1)(t)=C _(g) x _(k) ^(G)(t)+ζ_(k)(t)  (1) with ζ_(k) being the output disturbance and x_(k) ^(G) being the state of the plant. The state-space model for the compensator 20 is given by x _(k) ^(D)(t+1)=A _(D) x _(k) ^(D)(t)+B _(D) {y _(k)(t)−y _(k+1)(t)+ω_(k)(t)} u _(k)(t)=C _(D) x _(k) ^(D)(t)+D _(D) {y _(k)(t)−y _(k+1)(t)+ω_(k)(t)}  (2) where ω_(k) is the sensor noise and x) is the compensator state. The actuator is assumed to track follow on the reference track “k” and write the next or target track “k+1”. The closed-loop system is given by

$\begin{matrix} \begin{matrix} {\begin{bmatrix} {x_{k}^{D}\left( {t + 1} \right)} \\ {x_{k}^{G}\left( {t + 1} \right)} \end{bmatrix} = {{\begin{bmatrix} A_{D} & {{- B_{D}}C_{G}} \\ {B_{G}C_{D}} & {A_{G} - {B_{G}D_{D}C_{G}}} \end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix} {x_{k}^{D}(t)} \\ {x_{k}^{G}(t)} \end{bmatrix}} +}} \\ {{\begin{bmatrix} 0 \\ {{- B_{G}}D_{D}} \end{bmatrix}{ϛ_{k}(t)}} + {\begin{bmatrix} B_{D} \\ {B_{G}D_{D}} \end{bmatrix}{y_{k}(t)}} + {\begin{bmatrix} B_{D} \\ {B_{G}D_{D}} \end{bmatrix}{\omega_{k}(t)}}} \\ {{y_{k + 1}(t)} = {{\begin{bmatrix} 0 & C_{G} \end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix} {x_{k}^{D}(t)} \\ {x_{k}^{G}(t)} \end{bmatrix}} + {ϛ_{k}(t)}}} \end{matrix} & (3) \end{matrix}$ Equations 3 may be written as: x _(k)(t+1)=Ax _(k)(t)+B ₀ y _(k)(t)+B ₀ω_(k)(t)+{circumflex over (B)}ζ _(k)(t) y _(k+1)(t)=Cx _(k)(t)+ζ_(k)(t)  (4) where the matrices A, B₀, {circumflex over (B)}, {overscore (B)} may be obtained by comparison with equations 3, and N is the sum of plant and compensator orders, and

${x_{k}(t)} = {\begin{bmatrix} {x_{k}^{D}(t)} \\ {x_{k}^{G}(t)} \end{bmatrix}.}$

A = [ A D - B D ⁢ C G B G ⁢ C D A G - B G ⁢ D D ⁢ C G ] B 0 = [ B D B G ⁢ D D ] ∈ ⁢ N × 1 B ^ = [ 0 - B G ⁢ D D ] ∈ ⁢ N × 1 C = [ 0 C G ] ∈ ⁢ 1 × N ∈ ⁢ N × N ⁢ ( 5 ) A correction signal η_(k) (t) is added to the PES while servowriting the target track. In this case, equation (4) reduces to x _(k)(t+1)=Ax _(k)(t)+B ₀ y _(k)(t)+B ₀ω_(k)(t)+B ₀η_(k)(t)+{circumflex over (B)}ζ _(k)(t) y _(k+1)(t)=Cx _(k)(t)+ζ_(k)(t) t=0, 1, . . . , k=1, 2,  (6) where ζ_(k) (t) is to be determined. Combining the terms in sensor noise and disturbance provides the following x _(k)(t+1)=Ax _(k)(t)+B ₀ y _(k)(t)+B ₀η_(k)(t)+{overscore (Bd)} _(k)(t) y _(k+1)(t)=Cx _(k)(t)+ζ_(k)(t)  (7) where

$\begin{matrix} \begin{matrix} {\overset{\_}{B} = \begin{bmatrix} B_{0} & \hat{B} \end{bmatrix}} \\ {{\overset{\_}{d}}_{k} = \begin{bmatrix} \omega_{k} \\ \varsigma_{k} \end{bmatrix}} \end{matrix} & (8) \end{matrix}$ The modeled system of equation 7 has two dimensions, circumferential position (time t) and track number k.

In self servowriting, the target track is written after the actuator is track following on the reference track for a certain number of samples (or revolutions) so that the transients from a seek to the reference track have died down. For ease of notation, assume that one revolution of track following on the reference track is completed and the target track is written on the second revolution of track following. Let α be the number of sectors on the disk drive 30. The two-dimensional system of equation 7 can be reduced to a one dimensional system as follows:

Define the vectors Y(k)=[y _(k)(α)y _(k)(α+1) . . . y _(k)(2α−1)]^(T) ε

^(α×1) D(k)=[ω_(k)(α)η_(k)(α) . . . ω_(k)(2α−1)η_(k)(2α−1)]^(T) ε

^(2α×1) η(k)=[η_(k)(α)η_(k)(α+1) . . . η_(k)(2α−1)]^(T) ε

^(α×1) x(k,α)=x _(k)(α)ε

^(N×1)  (9) Then the reduced (one dimensional) dynamics which describe track to track characteristics are given by Y(k+1)={tilde over (φ)}Y(k)+Ση(k)+ΔD(k)+θx(k,α)  (10) where

ϕ ~ = Σ = [ 0 0 ⋯ 0 CB 0 0 ⋯ 0 ⋮ ⋮ ⋰ ⋮ CA α - 2 ⁢ B 0 CA α - 3 ⁢ B 0 ⋯ 0 ] ∈ ⁢ ⁢ α × α Δ = [ I 1 × 2 0 ⋯ 0 C ⁢ B _ I 1 × 2 ⋯ 0 ⋮ ⋮ ⋰ ⋮ CA α - 2 ⁢ B _ CA α - 3 ⁢ B _ ⋯ I 1 × 2 ] ∈ ⁢ α × 2 ⁢ α ⁢ θ = [ C CA ⋮ CA α - 1 ] ∈ ⁢ ( 11 ) and x(k,α) is the initial condition of the system at the start of servowriting the target track. The output is the measured PES while the track Y(k+1) is being written

$\begin{matrix} \begin{matrix} {{{e(k)} = {{Y(k)} - {Y\left( {k + 1} \right)} + {\omega(k)}}}\;} \\ {= {{Y(k)} - \left\{ {{\overset{\sim}{\phi}\; Y\;(k)} + {\Sigma\;{\eta(k)}} + {\Delta\;{D(k)}} + {\theta\;{x\left( {k,\alpha} \right)}}} \right\} + {\omega(k)}}} \\ {{= {{\left( {I - \overset{\sim}{\phi}} \right){Y(k)}} - {{\Sigma\eta}(k)} - {\Delta\;{D(k)}} - {\theta\;{x\left( {k,\alpha} \right)}} + {\omega(k)}}}\;} \end{matrix} & (12) \end{matrix}$ where ω(k)=[ω_(k)(α) . . . ω_(k)(2α−1)]^(T) The structure of the system is shown in FIG. 3. The reduced order system is completely observable but not completely controllable. This is due to the ‘state’ y_(k)(α) being specified only by the initial condition when the target track is written, namely x(k,α). However, a careful analysis shows that this initial condition is dependent on the reference and correction signal applied while track following of the reference track on the previous revolution(s) before writing the target track. Since the target track is written on the second revolution while track following (generalization to other numbers is straightforward) with the correction signal being applied all the time, the time domain response of the state of the system is given by

$\begin{matrix} {{x_{k}(t)} = {{A^{t}{x_{k}(0)}} + {\sum\limits_{i = 0}^{t - 1}\;{A^{t - 1 - i}B_{0}\left\{ {{y_{k}(i)} + {\eta_{k}(i)}} \right\}}} + {\sum\limits_{i = 0}^{t - 1}\;{A^{t - 1 - i}{{\overset{\_}{Bd}}_{k}(i)}}}}} & (13) \end{matrix}$ At t=α, the state of the system is given by

$\begin{matrix} {{x_{k}(\alpha)} = {{A^{\alpha}{x_{k}(0)}} + {\sum\limits_{i = 0}^{\alpha - 1}\;{A^{\alpha - 1 - i}B_{0}\left\{ {{y_{k}(i)} + {\eta_{k}(i)}} \right\}}} + {\sum\limits_{i = 0}^{\alpha - 1}\;{A^{\alpha - 1 - i}{{\overset{\_}{Bd}}_{k}(i)}}}}} & (14) \end{matrix}$ which is the initial condition when a target track is written. The dependence on y_(k) and η_(k) is clearly revealed in equation 14, which may be written as

$\begin{matrix} {{x_{k}(\alpha)} = {{A^{\alpha}{x_{k}(0)}} + {\begin{bmatrix} {A^{\alpha - 1}B_{0}} & {A^{\alpha - 2}B_{0}} & \cdots & B_{0} \end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix} {{y_{k}(0)} + {\eta_{k}(0)}} \\ \vdots \\ {{y_{k}\left( {\alpha - 1} \right)} + {\eta_{k}\left( {\alpha - 1} \right)}} \end{bmatrix}} + {\sum\limits_{i = 0}^{\alpha - 1}\;{A^{\alpha - 1 - i}{{\overset{\_}{Bd}}_{k}(i)}}}}} & (15) \end{matrix}$ Define Π=[A ^(α−1) B ₀ . . . B ₀]  (16) Substituting equation 15 into equation 10 provides

$\begin{matrix} {{Y\left( {k + 1} \right)} = {{\left\{ {\overset{\sim}{\phi} + {\theta\;\Pi}} \right\}{Y(k)}} + {\left\{ {\Sigma + {\theta\;\Pi}} \right\}{\eta(k)}} + {\Delta\;{D(k)}} + {\theta\left\{ {{A^{\alpha}{x_{k}(0)}} + {\sum\limits_{i = 0}^{\alpha - 1}\;{A^{\alpha - 1 - i}{{\overset{\_}{Bd}}_{k}(i)}}}} \right\}}}} & (17) \end{matrix}$ Substituting equation 15 into equation 12 provides

$\begin{matrix} \begin{matrix} {{e(k)} = {{Y(k)} - {Y\left( {k + 1} \right)} + {\omega(k)}}} \\ {= {{Y(k)} - \left\{ {{\left\lbrack {\overset{\sim}{\phi} + {\theta\;\Pi}} \right\rbrack{Y(k)}} + {\left\lbrack {\sum\;{{+ \theta}\;\Pi}} \right\rbrack{\eta(k)}} + {\Delta\; D(k)} +} \right.}} \\ {\left. {\theta\left\lbrack {{A^{\alpha}{x_{k}(0)}} + {\sum\limits_{i = 0}^{\alpha - 1}\;{A^{\alpha - 1 - i}{{\overset{\_}{Bd}}_{k}(i)}}}} \right\rbrack} \right\} + {\omega(k)}} \\ {= {{\left\{ {I - \overset{\sim}{\phi} - {\theta\;\Pi}} \right\}{Y(k)}} - {\left\lbrack {\sum\;{{+ \theta}\;\Pi}} \right\rbrack{\eta(k)}} - {\Delta\; D(k)} -}} \\ {{\theta\left\lbrack {{A^{\alpha}{x_{k}(0)}} + {\sum\limits_{i = 0}^{\alpha - 1}\;{A^{\alpha - 1 - i}{{\overset{\_}{Bd}}_{k}(i)}}}} \right\rbrack} + {\omega(k)}} \end{matrix} & (18) \end{matrix}$ The system 27 described by equations 17 and 18 is completely controllable and completely observable from the correction signal input. Thus, the correct model of initial conditions is important.

An observer 28 for this system may be constructed as follows: Ŷ(k+1)={{tilde over (φ)}+θΠ}Ŷ(k)+{Σ+θΠ}η(k)+K _(e) {e(k)−ê(k)} ê(k)=(I−{tilde over (φ)}−θΠ)Ŷ(k)−(Σ+θΠ)η(k)  (19) where K_(e) is chosen to place the eigenvalues of {tilde over (φ)}+θΠ+K_(e)(I−{tilde over (φ)}−θΠ) inside the unit circle. The correction signal η(k) is given by η(k)=−K _(c) Ŷ(k)  (20) where the compensator gain K_(c) is chosen so as to place the poles of {tilde over (φ)}+θΠ−{Σ+θΠ}K_(c) inside the unit circle. From linear control theory, the poles of the overall closed loop system are those of the estimator and controller and hence stable.

With reference to FIGS. 7 and 8, the present invention also may be embodied in a method 70 (FIG. 7), implemented in the disk drive 30, for creating servo burst patterns (FIG. 8) for tracks 12 on a rotating magnetic disk medium. In the method, track following is performed along a reference track N, defined by previously placed servo burst patterns, A and B, using a servo loop 22 (FIG. 4) having a closed-loop response (step 72). A position error signal (PES) is generated for the reference track based on the track following (step 74). A correction signal η_(k)(t) is generated based on the track following using an observer 28 (FIG. 5) of a compensator 20 based on a one-dimensional state model 26 that is equivalent to a two-dimensional state model of the servo loop (step 76). Servo patterns C and D are formed defining a target track N+1 during track following of the reference track (step 78). The position error signal of the servo loop is adjusted based on the correction signal to reduce radial error propagation from the reference track to the target track.

Self servowriting techniques for forming the servo burst patterns to define the servo tracks is described in more detail in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/541,136, filed on Mar. 31, 2000, and titled SELF-SERVO WRITING A DISK DRIVE BY PROPAGATING INTERLEAVED SETS OF TIMING CLOCKS AND SERVO BURSTS DURING ALTERNATE TIME INTERVALS, which is incorporated herein by reference. 

1. A method for writing servo patterns for tracks on a rotating magnetic disk medium, comprising: track following along a reference track, defined by previously written servo burst patterns, using a servo loop having a closed-loop response; generating a position error signal for the reference track based on the track following; generating a correction signal based on the track following using an observer of a one-dimensional state model that is equivalent to a two-dimensional state model of the servo loop; and writing servo patterns at a target radial location on the magnetic disk medium during track following of the reference track, wherein the position error signal of the servo loop is adjusted based on the correction signal to reduce radial error propagation from the reference track to the servo burst patterns at the target radial location.
 2. A method for writing servo patterns as defined in claim 1, wherein the dimensions of the two-dimensional state model are circumferential position and radial position.
 3. Apparatus for writing servo patterns for tracks on a rotating magnetic disk medium, comprising: means for track following along a reference track, defined by previously written servo burst patterns, using a servo loop having a closed-loop response; means for generating a position error signal for the reference track based on the track following; means for generating a correction signal based on the track following using an observer of a one-dimensional state model that is equivalent to a two-dimensional state model of the servo loop; and means for writing servo patterns at a target radial location on the magnetic disk medium during track following of the reference track, wherein the position error signal of the servo loop is adjusted based on the correction signal to reduce radial error propagation from the reference track to the servo burst patterns at the target radial location.
 4. Apparatus for writing servo patterns as defined in claim 3, wherein the dimensions of the two-dimensional state model are circumferential position and radial position.
 5. A method for creating servo patterns for tracks on a rotating magnetic disk medium, comprising: track following along a reference track, defined by previously placed servo burst patterns, using a servo loop having a closed-loop response; generating a position error signal for the reference track based on the track following; generating a correction signal based on the track following using an observer of a one-dimensional state model that is equivalent to a two-dimensional state model of the servo loop; and forming servo patterns defining a target track during track following of the reference track, wherein the position error signal of the servo loop is adjusted based on the correction signal to reduce radial error propagation from the reference track to the target track.
 6. A method for creating servo patterns as defined in claim 5, wherein the dimensions of the two-dimensional state model are circumferential position and radial position.
 7. Apparatus for creating servo patterns for tracks on a rotating magnetic disk medium, comprising: means for track following along a reference track, defined by previously placed servo burst patterns, using a servo loop having a closed-loop response; means for generating a position error signal for the reference track based on the track following; means for generating a correction signal based on the track following using an observer of a one-dimensional state model that is equivalent to a two-dimensional state model of the servo loop; and means for forming servo patterns defining a target track during track following of the reference track, wherein the position error signal of the servo loop is adjusted based on the correction signal to reduce radial error propagation from the reference track to the target track.
 8. Apparatus for creating servo patterns as defined in claim 7, wherein the dimensions of the two-dimensional state model are circumferential position and radial position. 